Most social spheres are today characterized by networks. For a long time, an ethos of connectivity has dominated: the more connections the better!
However, today this euphoria for connectedness has lost its appeal. Our constant availability is demanding its price, open-plan offices face increasing criticism and new security risks cause concerns. Based on analyses of such crises of hyperconnectivity, Urs Stäheli ponders the limits of connectedness from three different angles – as...
Most social spheres are today characterized by networks. For a long time, an ethos of connectivity has dominated: the more connections the better!
However, today this euphoria for connectedness has lost its appeal. Our constant availability is demanding its price, open-plan offices face increasing criticism and new security risks cause concerns. Based on analyses of such crises of hyperconnectivity, Urs Stäheli ponders the limits of connectedness from three different angles – as a criticism of relational social theories, as a culturalsociological analysis of the figures of disconnection and as a genealogy of the practices of disconnecting in different fields.